Legislator requires proof of safety
Also for herbal medicinal products, the safety must be proven in toxicity studies during the marketing authorisation procedure. With regard to a possible genotoxic effect in herbal preparations, legal framework conditions and standardised measurement models apply. They are summarized by Kooperation Phytopharmaka in the following article. In addition, Kooperation Phytopharmaka offers to directly purchase individual data on selected plant extracts for the AMES test model.
Risk assessment using AMES tests
In the context of drug development, pharmaceutical companies are required to carry out a risk assessment of the occurrence of potentially genotoxic impurities in the medicinal produc. In the case of herbal medicinal products, the extract or a powdered herbal drug is the active substance. Regarding combination products, evidence of the absence of a genotoxic potential must be provided for each individual active substance. This is regulated in the Guideline on the use of the CTD format in the preparation of a registration application for traditional herbal medicinal products (EMA/HMPC/71049/2007 Rev.2). According to this, in Module 2.4, an expert report on the safety assessment of the non-clinical data must be submitted. It is recommended to apply the Guideline on non-clinical documentation in applications for marketing authorisation/ registration applications of well-established and traditional herbal medicinal products (EMEA/HMPC/32116/2005). In particular, reference is made to the following two guidelines for herbal products:
- Guideline on the assessment of genotoxicity of herbal substances/preparations (EMEA/HMPC/107079/2007)
- Guideline on the selection of test materials for genotoxicity testing for traditional herbal medicinal products/herbal medicinal products (EMEA/HMPC/67644/2009)
In the Guideline on the assessment of the genotoxicity of herbal substances/preparations (EMEA/HMPC/107079/2007), the HMPC has described a step-by-step approach to genotoxicity testing. According to this, the AMES test (in vitro) is a sufficient basis for the assessment of genotoxicity if the result is clearly negative. The following guideline must be observed for implementation: OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4 | OECD
Procedure in the event of positive AMES tests
If there is an inconclusive test result, individual substances are often the cause, which lead the AMES in vitro test to a false positive result. This can be excluded on the basis of tests according to two further documents or traced back to the test extract without any doubt:
- Test No. 487: In Vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test (EN)
- Test No. 474: Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test (EN)
Order AMES test results
In recent years, Kooperation Phytopharmaka has acquired or commissioned around 120 AMES tests (in accordance with Directive 2000/32/EC, Method B.13/14 and OECD Guideline 471). Individual reports can be purchased from the database. Note: Please check in advance whether the characteristics of the test extract (extraction solvent, DER range) fit your product and please contact our office.
AMES tests
| Droge | Auszugsmittel | DER | Nativer Extrakt | Jahr |
| Allii sativi (Knoblauchöl) | raffiniertes Rüböl | 2 - 3 : 1 | 96% | 2008 |
| Aloe | Wasser | 1 - 3 : 1 | 2011 | |
| Althaeae radix (Eibischwurzel) | Wasser | 3 - 7 : 1 | 70% | 2008 |
| Anguratae | Wasser | 6 : 1 | 90% | 2010 |
| Arnika | Ethanol 70 % (V/V) | 1:10 | 2013 | |
| Berberis | Ethanol 62 % m/m | D1V.19F | 2010 | |
| Berberis | Tinktur | V4A | 2010 | |
| Betula (Birkenblätter) | Wasser | 4 - 8 : 1 | 90% | 2010 |
| Betula (Birkenblätter) | Heptan | 44.9 : 1 | 50% | 2011 |
| Betula (Birkenblätter) | Ethanol 50% m/m | 26,5 : 1 | 50% | 2011 |
| Cardui mariae fructus (Silybum Marianum / Mariendistelfrüchte) | Aceton | 25-40:1 | 100% | 2011 |
| Cardui mariae fructus (Silybum Marianum / Mariendistelfrüchte) | Aceton | 20-30:1 | 2012 | |
| Cardui mariae fructus (Silybum Marianum / Mariendistelfrüchte) | Ethanol 60 % (V/V) | 20 - 30 :1 | 2013 | |
| Cardui mariae fructus (Silybum Marianum / Mariendistelfrüchte) | Ethanol 96 % V/V | 30 - 40 : 1 | 80% | 2012 |
| Cardui mariae fructus (Silybum Marianum / Mariendistelfrüchte) | n-Heptan | 13:1 | 50% | 2012 |
| Cardui mariae fructus DAB (Silybum Marianum / Mariendistelfrüchte) | Wasser | 8-10:1 | 70% | 2008 |
| Carvi fructus (Kümmel) | Ethanol 30% | 1: 2,5 - 3,5 | 100% | 2008 |
| Crataegus Blätter | Ethanol 45 % (V/V) | 4 - 7:1 | 2008 | |
| Crataegus Blätter mit Blüten | Ethanol 45 % (V/V) | 4 - 7 : 1 | 90% | 2008 |
| Crataegus Blätter mit Blüten | Methanol 70 % (V/V) | 4- 7 : 1 | 80% | 2008 |
| Crataegus Blätter mit Blüten | Ethanol 90 % (V/V) | 3,5 - 5,0 :1 | 49% | 2008 |
| Crataegus Blätter mit Blüten | Wasser | 2,7 : 1 | 54% | 2009 |
| Crataegus Blätter mit Blüten | n-Hexan | 116 : 1 | 70% | 2009 |
| Crataegus Blätter mit Blüten | Presssaft | 1 : 1,6 - 2,2 | 2008 | |
| Crataegus Blätter mit Blüten | Ethanol 23,6 / (V/V) | 2008 | ||
| Crataegus Früchte Fluidextrakt | Ethanol 50%m/m | 1:1 | 2008 | |
| Crataegus Früchte Ölmazerat | Rapsöl | 1 : 2 | 2008 | |
| Crataegus Früchte Ölmazerat | Rapsöl | 0,6 - 0,8 : 1 | 80% | 2008 |
| Crataegus Früchte Pressaft | Wasser | 2008 | ||
| Crataegus Früchte Trockenextrakt | Methanol 70 % (V/V) | 4 - 7 : 1 | 50% | 2008 |
| Crataegus Früchte Urtinktur (HAB 2000) | 86 % (M/M) Ethanol | 2008 | ||
| Curcubitae (Kürbiskernöl) | 2008 | |||
| Cynara/ Artischocke | Wasser | 5,8 - 7,5 : 1 | 90% | 2008 |
| Cynara/ Artischocke | Ethanol 50% V/V | 5,6 :1 | 75% | 2012 |
| Cynara/ Artischocke | n-Heptan | 55:1 | 50% | 2012 |
| Cynara/ Artischocke | Pressaft | 2008 | ||
| Dry Extract of Ginkgo Biloba Leaves DAB 2000 | Aceton 60%m/m | 35 - 67 : 1 | 2008 | |
| Dulcamarae stipites (Bittersüßstengel) | Ethanol 30 5 m/m | 5 : 1 | 2008 | |
| Echinacea | Trockenpresssaft | 88% | 2015 | |
| Eleutherococci Radix (Taigawurzel) | Ethanol 19% | 1 : 19,2-20 | 2011 & 2013 | |
| Espeletia Urtinktur (Mönchspflanze) | 2011 | |||
| Eukalyptusbalsam (Eukalyptusöl, Cineo, Kiefernnadelöl, Campher) | 2010 | |||
| Fichtennadelöl DAB | 2011 | |||
| Ginkgo | Ethanol 62,5 % V/V | Urtinktur | 2008 | |
| 24,5% Ginkgoflavon-Glycoside, 6% Terpenlactone | Aceton 60%m/m | 35 - 67 : 1 | 2008 | |
| Ginseng | Liqiud Extrakt | 1: 9,8-10 | 2011 | |
| Ginseng | Wasser | 2,7 : 1 | 70% | 2009 |
| Ginseng | n-Heptan | 149 : 1 | 25% | 2009 |
| Ginseng | Ethanol 30 %m/m | 3 - 4,5 : 1 | 95% | 2008 |
| Ginseng | Ethanol 60 %(V/V) | 3 - 4 : 1 | 70% | 2008 |
| Hamamelidis e cort.sicc. | Ethanol 30%m/m | 5-7,7:1 | 70% | 2013 |
| Harpagophytum (Teufelskralle) | Ethanol 60% (V/V) | 4 - 5 : 1 | 95% | 2009 |
| Hedera (Efeu) | Ethanol 30 % (M/M) | 4 - 8 : 1 | 100% | 2013 |
| Hippocastani folium (Roßkastaniensamen) | Wasser | 3- 6 : 1 | 68% | 2010 |
| Hippocastani folium (Roßkastaniensamen) | Ethanol 50 % V/V | 4,5 - 5,5 : 1 | 2012 | |
| Hippocastani folium (Roßkastaniensamen) | Ethanol 68% V/V | 5 - 7 : 1 | 80-100% | 2008 |
| Hippocastani folium (Roßkastaniensamen) | Ethanol 19 % m/m | 1 : 2 | 2011 | |
| Hippocastani folium (Roßkastaniensamen) | Methanol 80%m/m | 5 - 8 : 1 | 100% | 2011 |
| Humulus (Hopfen) | Methanol 45 %m/m | 7,7 - 9,5 : 1 | 70% | 2008 |
| Humulus (Hopfen) | Wasser | 5,5 - 6,5 : 1 | 90% | 2008 |
| Humulus (Hopfen) | Ethnol 90 % (V/V) | 9 - 11 : 1 | 50% | 2008 |
| Humulus (Hopfen) | Heptan | 11,2 : 1 | 50% | 2008 |
| Hypericum (Johanniskraut) | Ethanol 80 % (V/V) | 3 - 6 : 1 | 99% | 2008 |
| Hypericum (Johanniskraut) | Pressaft | 1 : 0,5 - 0,9 | 2008 | |
| Hypericum (Johanniskraut) | Wasser | 8 - 12 : 1 | 65% | 2008 |
| Hypericum (Johanniskraut) | Methanol 80 % | 3 - 6 : 1 | 94% | 2008 |
| Hypericum (Johanniskraut) | Ethanol 50% (V/V) | 5 - 8 : 1 | 90% | 2008 |
| Hypericum (Johanniskraut) | n-Heptan | 48 : 1 | 50% | 2008 |
| Hypericum (Johanniskraut) | raffiniertes Maisöl | 0,075 : 1 oder 1:13 | 65% | 2013 |
| Liquiritiae radix (Süßholz) | Wasser | 3 - 4 : 1 | 2008 | |
| Liquiritiae radix (Süßholz) | Ethanol 30% (V/V) | 1 : 2,5 - 3,5 | 100% | 2008 |
| Matricariae (Kamille) | Fluid Extrakt 0,3% | 2009 | ||
| Matricariae (Kamille) | Ethanol 30%(V/V) | 1 : 2 - 4 | 100% | 2009 |
| Matricariae (Kamille) | Wasser | 4:1 (nativ) | 95% | 2009 |
| Melissae folium (Melisse) | n-Heptan | 47;4 : 1 | 50% | 2008 |
| Melissae folium (Melisse) | Ethanol 70% (m/m) | 6 : 1 | 2012 | |
| Melissae folium (Melisse) | Ethanol 30% | 1:2,5 - 3,5 | 100% | 2008 |
| Melissae folium (Melisse) | Wasser | 4 - 6 : 1 | 90% | 2008 |
| Orthosiphon Blätter, Trockenextrakt (Katzenbart) | Wasser | 5-7:1 | 2013 | |
| Passiflorae herba (Passionsblumenkraut) | Ethanol 68% (V/V) | 6 - 7 : 1 | 80% | 2008 |
| Passiflorae herba (Passionsblumenkraut) | Ethanol 25%m/m | 6 - 8 : 1 | 80% | 2008 |
| Passiflorae herba (Passionsblumenkraut) | Wasser | 3 - 5 : 1 | 80% | 2008 |
| Passiflorae herba (Passionsblumenkraut) | n-Heptan | 46,7 : 1 | 50% | 2008 |
| Pelargonium sidoides | Ethanol 15 % | 1 : 8 - 9 | 2012 | |
| Pinus (Latschenkiefernöl) | 2008 | |||
| Primula (Primelwurzel) | Ethanol 60%m/m | 5 - 7 : 1 | 70% | 2008 |
| Primula (Primelwurzel) | Wasser | 4 - 6 : 1 | 2012 | |
| Rosmarini (Rosmarin) | Ethanol 19% (V/V) | 0,9 - 1,1 :1 | 2008 | |
| Rosmarini (Rosmarin) | Wasser | 4 - 7 : 1 | 70% | 2008 |
| Sabal (Sägepalmenfrüchte) | Ethanol 90% (V/V) | 7 - 13 : 1 | 50% | 2011 |
| Sabal (Sägepalmenfrüchte) | cum oleum Arachidis | 7,85 - 12,5 : 1 | 76% genuine Extract, 24% Peanut Oil | 2009 |
| Salvia (Salbei) | Wasser | 5,5 - 6,7 : 1 | 2011 | |
| Salvia (Salbei) | Ethanol 50 % (M/M) | 6,9 : 1 | 50% | 2011 |
| Salvia (Salbei) | n-Heptan | 24,4 :1 | 50% | 2011 |
| Sennesblätter | Wasser | 4 - 6 : 1 | 2011 | |
| Sennesfrüchte | Methanol 30% (V/V) | 4-7:1 | 67,5-99% | 2019 |
| Solidago (Goldrute) | Ethanol 60% (V/V) | 5 - 7 : 1 | 70% | 2011 |
| Thymianöl | 100% | 2008 | ||
| Thymus | Wasser | 6,2 : 1 | 50% | 2008 |
| Thymus | Ethanol 70 % (V/V) | 6-10:1 | 2008 | |
| Thymus | Methanol 25 % V/V | 5 - 7 : 1 | 65- 75 % | 2012 |
| Thymus | gemäß DAB 2003 | 1 : 2 - 2,5 | 100% | 2008 |
| Urticae herba (Brennessel-Kraut) | n-Hexan | 124 : 1 | 50% | 2009 |
| Urticae herba (Brennessel-Kraut) | 2-Propanol | 15,3 : 1 | 60% | 2009 |
| Urticae herba (Brennessel-Kraut) | Ethanol 50 %(V/V) | 5 - 10 : 1 | 80% | 2009 |
| Urticae herba (Brennessel-Kraut) | Pressaft | 1,63 - 1,96 : 1 | 2008 | |
| Urticae herba (Brennessel-Kraut) | Wasser | 4 - 7 : 1 | 70% | 2008 |
| Urticae radix (Brennessel-Wurzel) | Ethanol 20 % (V/V) | 5,5 - 8,5 : 1 | 70% | 2008 |
| Urticae radix (Brennessel-Wurzel) | N-Hexan | 317:1 | 100% | 2012 |
| Valerianae (Baldrian) | Wasser | 3 - 6 : 1 | 70% | 2008 |
| Valerianae (Baldrian) | 40 % Ehanol (V/V) | 4 - 7 : 1 | 80% | 2008 |
| Valerianae (Baldrian) | 70 % Ethanol (V/V) | 3 - 6 : 1 | 80% | 2008 |
| Valerianae (Baldrian) | Heptan | 100% | 2008 | |
| Valerianae (Baldrian) Ölmazerat | 96 % Ethanol | 1 : 10 | 2008 | |
| Visci albi fructus (Mistel) | Wasser | 4 - 6 : 1 | 90% | 2008 |
| Visci albi fructus (Mistel) Ölmazerat | 2 - 3 : 1 | 2008 | ||
| Visci albi fructus (Mistel) Pressaft | 1 : 1,6 - 2,2 | 2008 | ||
| Visci albi fructus (Mistel) Tinktur | Ethanol 40%(V/V) | 1:5 | 2008 | |
| Visci albi fructus (Mistel) Tropfen | Likörwein Ethanol 96%(V/V) | 1 : 5,9 | 2008 | |
| Visci albi fructus (Mistel) Urtinktur | Ethanol 86 %m/m | 2008 |
HMPC List entries
In order to reduce the effort required for testing individual herbal substances/preparations, the HMPC has issued the Guideline on the selection of test materials for genotoxicity testing for traditional herbal medicinal products/herbal medicinal products (EMEA/HMPC/67644/2009). It allows testing of a standard set of test materials that can be considered representative of the commonly used preparations from a particular herbal medicinal product according to a “bracketing/matrixing” approach. This was carried out by Kooperation Phytopharmaka using the example of a Valerian root. By producing extracts from a herbal drug batch with different solvents (polar to non-polar extraction solvents), the entire range of individual substances could be covered and tested by the AMES test. Further information on this project can be found here. For valerian root, the overall non-critical data led to the creation of a so-called list entry by the HMPC. These list entries subsequently published by the EU Commission describe herbal preparations for which a genotoxic potential could not be proven.
Is there no such list item for a respective extract/a drug powder and/or is it not included in the Kooperation Phytopharmaka database? Get in touch with us. We will be happy to arrange appropriate laboratory services.